This paper explores the evolving landscape of teacher evaluation and feedback mechanisms, highlighting recent innovations that aim to enhance teaching effectiveness and professional development. Traditional methods of teacher assessment have often been criticized for being subjective and inflexible, which has prompted a shift towards more dynamic and comprehensive approaches. The analysis delves into the integration of technology in the form of e-portfolios, online platforms for feedback, and automated assessment tools, which are transforming the way teachers are evaluated. Additionally, the paper examines the adoption of peer review processes and the use of student feedback to provide a well-rounded perspective on teaching performance. It further discusses the importance of fostering a culture of continuous improvement through constructive feedback, and concludes with a call for further research to refine these innovative practices and ensure they are equitable and effective.
Jackson, J. (2021). Innovations in Teacher Evaluation and Feedback. Frontiers of Educational Review, 3(2), 24. doi:10.69610/j.fer.20211130
ACS Style
Jackson, J. Innovations in Teacher Evaluation and Feedback. Frontiers of Educational Review, 2021, 3, 24. doi:10.69610/j.fer.20211130
AMA Style
Jackson J. Innovations in Teacher Evaluation and Feedback. Frontiers of Educational Review; 2021, 3(2):24. doi:10.69610/j.fer.20211130
Chicago/Turabian Style
Jackson, John 2021. "Innovations in Teacher Evaluation and Feedback" Frontiers of Educational Review 3, no.2:24. doi:10.69610/j.fer.20211130
Share and Cite
ACS Style
Jackson, J. Innovations in Teacher Evaluation and Feedback. Frontiers of Educational Review, 2021, 3, 24. doi:10.69610/j.fer.20211130
AMA Style
Jackson J. Innovations in Teacher Evaluation and Feedback. Frontiers of Educational Review; 2021, 3(2):24. doi:10.69610/j.fer.20211130
Chicago/Turabian Style
Jackson, John 2021. "Innovations in Teacher Evaluation and Feedback" Frontiers of Educational Review 3, no.2:24. doi:10.69610/j.fer.20211130
APA style
Jackson, J. (2021). Innovations in Teacher Evaluation and Feedback. Frontiers of Educational Review, 3(2), 24. doi:10.69610/j.fer.20211130
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Kay, J. (2007). E-portfolios for teacher professional development: A model for change. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 977-993.
Fryer, J. (2011). Using online platforms to support the evaluation of teacher performance. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 24-35.
Harden, L. (2007). Computerized assessment: A good practice guide. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(4), 423-434.
Lieberman, A. (2004). Peer review of teaching: A best practices guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kane, T. G. (2006). Student feedback on teaching: The challenge of designing effective feedback systems. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 457-467.
Harman, G., & Hargreaves, A. (2004). The challenges of implementing new teacher evaluation systems. School Leadership & Management, 24(2), 137-152.
Eryan, U. (2010). The impact of peer review and student feedback on teacher performance and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1682-1689.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Teacher evaluation and development: Best evidence from research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Wiliam, D. (2007). Feedback: Giving it and getting it. In T. B. Jones (Ed.), The teacher's toolkit (pp. 33-56). Middlesex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
